Monuments should not be ideologically motivated or created
at the behest of the highest bidder. The
proposed Memorial to the Victims of Communism in Ottawa is both. Controversy has been increasing for months
now over a plan to place the monument in what is currently an unnamed park
between the Supreme Court of Canada and Library and Archives buildings on
Wellington Street. Conservative
politicians, especially Jason Kenney, John Baird, and Pierre “the petulant”
Poilievre have been especially aggressive on this cause, which is financed by
an organization calling itself Tribute to Liberty, an organization of
individuals who have either been victimized by communist governments or have
family members who were.
I oppose communism. I
cannot think of one single good example of it working in any country where it
was or is the system of government. It
results in a complete loss of civil rights, economic mediocrity, threatens
peace, and ends up being equally elitist to the system it replaces. It assumes humans are capable of perfection
and no wrongdoing when organized collectively.
The reality check is that we are human and no matter how well we are
organized, nothing is ever going to be perfect.
For decades, the site of the Ottawa monument was to be the location of a
new courthouse to house the Federal Court of Canada—historically known as the
Exchequer Court. Conservative politicians
have ignored that plan and have designated it as the site for the monument
instead. The ideological and arrogant
Mr. Kenney, along with the noxious and nasty Mr. Poilievre continually say “nobody
really wants another government office building in downtown Ottawa” as their
justification for locating the oversized memorial on the site. A courthouse is just not another government
office building. It is where justice is
served for the public good. A courthouse
is probably a far better monument to democracy than slabs of stone and
steel. Mr. Kenney and Mr. Poilievre’s
comments about the proposed courthouse being just another government office
building are telling signs of the contempt the Conservatives have for the
impartial and often activist judiciary.
Tribute to Liberty has basically raised money in such a way that they
could buy favour with the government and have their preferred site for the
memorial. The ideological motivations of
the Conservatives have most likely eased their efforts. I am positive that the Harper government
thinks any government responsibility beyond the armed forces is radical
socialism. What Tribute to Liberty has
done, and what the government has done through its collaboration is completely
undemocratic. It actually resembles the
bribery, collaboration, and corruption that one associates with the dysfunction
of communist countries.
Ottawa City Council has passed a resolution asking that the
monument be relocated. The issue is
increasingly receiving national attention.
The idea of a memorial itself is not necessarily bad, but it should not
be in the location proposed, and it should not be so bold and garish in order
to make an ideological statement. There
are other monuments in honour of various victims, battles, and events
throughout Ottawa. None of these are as
imposing or are as ideologically motivated as the proposed Memorial to the
Victims of Communism. This monument
would end up being the second-largest of its kind in the capital, with only the
National War Memorial being larger. The
Royal Canadian Navy monument is located in a small park by the Portage Bridge
and the Ottawa River. Why should the
contribution of the sailors who have served our country for over a century be dwarfed? Many of these sailors served in a capacity
where they were containing or curtailing communism! The same applies to soldiers and
aviators! My grandfather was in the
RCAF, he always called himself a veteran of the Cold War and even has a medal
for it. The only large memorials in our
capital city should be for our military personnel. People served and sacrificed their lives for
Canada for non-partisan, non-ideological reasons. Smaller monuments are perfectly acceptable,
and they certainly should not rival or usurp those honouring our war dead and
veterans who served under national motivation, not nationalist or ideological
motivation. Our national monuments
should not be constructed due to political interference and the fundraising efforts
of the highest bidder.
No comments:
Post a Comment